The Graduate Thriving Quotient

Scales and coefficients

The 24 items on the TQ cluster onto five scales:

• Engaged Learning

  A measure of the degree to which students are meaningfully processing what happens in class and energized by what they are learning.

  α .90

  Sample item “I feel energized by the ideas I am learning in most of my classes.”

• Academic Determination

  A measure of students’ goal-directedness, investment of effort, and regulation of their own learning and use of time.

  α .80

  Sample item “I am confident I will reach my educational goals.”

• Positive Perspective

  A measure of students’ optimism and explanatory style.

  α .74

  Sample item “I look for the best in situations, even when things seem hopeless.”

• Social Connectedness

  A measure of students’ involvement in healthy relationships and social support networks, whether on or off campus.

  α .83

  Sample item “I feel like my friends really care about me.”

• Diverse Citizenship

  A measure of students’ desire to make a difference in the community around them, as well as their openness to differences in others.

  α .79

  Sample item “I value interacting with people whose viewpoints are different from my own.”

Pathways to thriving

Examining thriving among graduate students developed out of a desire to understand student success more holistically than previous higher education research that had focused solely on student retention. Dr. Laurie Schreiner developed the Thriving Quotient™ (TQ) using concepts from positive psychology (i.e., flourishing) and Bean and Eaton’s (2000) retention model to introduce the term thriving to “describe the experiences of college students who are fully engaged intellectually, socially, and emotionally” (Schreiner, 2010, p. 4). Thriving is not about personality traits, but rather describes malleable qualities within a student, meaning that institutions can teach students to thrive. Years of TQ research has documented specific experiences that serve as significant pathways to student thriving; these pathways are also measured in the online survey:

• Sense of Community

  A measure of student belonging, ownership, and sense of mattering to the institution.

  α .87

  Sample item “I feel like I belong here.”

• Institutional Integrity

  A measure of the degree to which students perceive the institution to be “delivering on its promises.”

  α .84

  Sample item “This institution was accurately portrayed during the admissions process.”

• Spirituality

  A measure of the degree to which students have a sense of meaning and purpose in their life that provides strengths during difficult times.

  α .93

  Sample item “My spiritual or religious beliefs provide me with a sense of strength when life is difficult.”

• Faculty Sensitivity to Diverse Learners

  A measure of students’ perceptions of faculty inclusion of multiple perspectives in their curriculum and pedagogy, as well as their sensitivity to the needs of diverse learners.

  α .88

  Sample item “How satisfied are you with the degree to which your instructors include diverse perspectives in the curriculum?”

• Satisfaction with Faculty Interactions

  A measure of students’ satisfaction with how often they interact with faculty as well as quality of those interactions.

  α .79

  Sample item “How satisfied are you with the quality of the interactions you have had with your instructors so far this year?”

What else the survey assesses

In addition to these predictive pathways, the instrument assesses students’ satisfaction with learning, advising, peer interactions, their living situation, mental and physical health, and overall satisfaction with their graduate school experience. The Grad TQ also measures the degree to which students feel their program is a good fit for them, as well as demographic characteristics such as gender, age, race/ethnicity, marital status, parental status, household income, generation status, undergraduate GPA, type of program, hours per week they work, and whether the institution was their first choice at enrollment. Target group reports can be requested on any of these demographic characteristics to determine whether thriving levels are significantly different across subpopulations of students.

How administration works

Participation and norms

Pending — stated per institution size in the administration guidance.

Process

Your campus receives a survey link to distribute to the sampled population. Responses return directly to The Thriving Project; your institution does not host or process the data.

Timeline

The survey opens for a defined window during the academic term. Reporting follows once the window closes; the schedule is confirmed when administration is booked.

Human subjects

Institutional review requirements vary by campus and by intended use of the results. Human-subjects guidance is issued with the instrument, and written permission is granted for research use.

Citation and permissions

Questions about this instrument